Why is a device model reviewed only once?
Every device of the same model ships with the same built-in apps, so mapping the essentials once is enough. After a model is reviewed and published, every later device of that model is provisioned with the same correct profile and nobody has to look at it again.
The reason for a review is that makers hide different system apps and name them differently. A dialler on one tablet is a file manager on another. If Skie treated them all the same, it could hide something your students need or leave something visible you meant to remove. The review maps the basics so that does not happen.
The work is about the model, not the device. A hundred identical tablets of one model carry identical software, so a hundred reviews would produce a hundred identical results. One review captures it. The next device of that model provisions straight away, and the readiness gate has nothing to flag.
What the review covers is deliberately narrow. It covers the system apps found on the model, the essentials that must stay, and the handling of the maker's own extras. It does not change your policy, your app lists or your schedules. Those stay yours.
A review is not required to use the model at all. An unreviewed model can be provisioned, but with a cautious treatment, covered in its own entry. The review simply gets you the full, correct behaviour.
A new review is only needed when something genuinely changes, for example a different hardware variant, or a maker's software update that adds built-in apps. The master device is the quickest way to check.
Practical tip: when you place a tablet order, ask the supplier for the exact model name and number so the models page can match it. See what a model profile is and what an unreviewed model gets.
- Same model, same built-in apps
- Review covers system apps only
- Does not change your policy or app lists
- Repeat only for a new variant or update